Choice // speed and reliability
Choosing Among Three Mirrors
All three mirrors open the exact same market. There is no unique content locked behind any specific address. The difference between them comes down to speed and reliability. You are choosing a route, not a different store.
The short answer
Any of the three is fine
The short answer is that any of the three is perfectly fine. Start with the one that responds fastest for you specifically. Adjust as needed based on real-world performance.
The three, side by side
| No | Address | Status | Last check | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | blackops27m32abqvbhnyswgazqawxqbznbzkkkv5sjo7gve2ndpsdad.onion | Online | Nov 10, 2026 | |
| 02 | blackops5l63qnwnmlnsfvtlu66md3x3vp3fdtpna42eq7ozujr67hid.onion | Online | Nov 10, 2026 | |
| 03 | blackops6kignp3eddmvqcfkjzf6qr6haxbmkypc2xtqlnhuu4ak4dqd.onion | Online | Nov 10, 2026 |
Latency varies based on your physical location and your Tor circuit. What feels fast for one user may feel sluggish for another. The choice is personal and dynamic. You control which door you walk through.
When to switch, and when not to
Switch mirrors if your current one is consistently slow. Persistent lag is a signal to move.
Change your address if one mirror drops your connection often. Instability warrants a new route.
Update your link if a rotation retired the address you were using. This is mandatory.
You do not need to switch for a one-off blip. Occasional delays are normal in Tor.
What the numbers mean and do not mean
The latency and uptime figures listed above are operational readings, not guarantees. They reflect average conditions over a set period. Your own route through the Tor network matters just as much.
A high uptime percentage indicates stability, while low median RTT suggests quick response times. These metrics help you gauge relative health. However, your specific network path dictates your actual experience. Test the mirrors yourself to see what works best for your setup. A longer treatment of the latency figure lives in the log.